Key result
Manual BP measurement yields ~100% more significant diastolic variability than automated readings.
Why the study?
Blood pressure varies depending on several factors, prompting the need to describe within-visit blood pressure variability in healthy children and compare manual versus automated readings.
Does automated blood pressure measurement reduce within-visit blood pressure variability compared to manual measurement in children and adolescents?
Cross-Sectional (n=5,656)
Does automated blood pressure measurement reduce within-visit blood pressure variability compared to manual measurement in children and adolescents?
In children and adolescents, within-visit diastolic blood pressure variability is higher with manual measurement than with automated measurement, suggesting multiple readings are necessary for accurate assessment.
May support automated BP devices in youth to curb variability; leaves open effects on hypertension diagnosis.
BACKGROUND: Blood pressure (BP) varies depending on several factors. The objective of our study was to describe within-visit BP variability (BPV) in healthy children and compare BPV between manual and automated BP readings. METHODS: We included individuals aged 8-17 years with three BP readings from NHANES 2013-2020 cycles. From 2013 to 2016, BP was obtained using auscultation (manual protocol, MP) and, subsequently, using oscillometry (automated protocol, AP). We excluded individuals with DBP 'zero'. RESULTS: In 5656 individuals [MP group: 3365 (59.5%); AP group: 2291 (40.5%]), a ΔBP (difference between highest and lowest of three BP readings) at least 5 mmHg was noted in 49.1 and 60.7% of individuals for SBP and DBP, respectively. ΔDBP at least 10 mmHg was twice as common in the MP group as in the AP group. ΔDBP at least 20 mmHg was observed in 4.4% individuals. A difference of at least 5 mmHg between the initial and averaged second and third BP readings was noted in 24.9 and 34.5% of individuals for SBP and DBP, respectively. The highest of three BP readings was the first, second, or third in 44.2, 30.5, and 25.4% of individuals, for SBP, and 42.4, 29.8, and 27.7%, for DBP respectively. CONCLUSION: Less than half of individuals had three DBP readings within 5 mmHg and some had ΔBP at least 20 mmHg. Initial BP is not always the highest; inclusion of the second and third BP readings may be more representative of the individual's actual BP. DBPV was higher with manual than with automated BP measurement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Riar et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy children and adolescents (n=5,656). Manual blood pressure measurement vs. Automated blood pressure measurement was evaluated on Within-visit blood pressure variability (difference between highest and lowest of three readings). Manual blood pressure measurement yielded twice the rate of diastolic variability ≥10 mmHg compared to automated measurement, with overall ΔBP ≥5 mmHg occurring in 49.1% (SBP) and 60.7% (DBP).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: