Key result
Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation progressed to chronic AF in 77.2% of patients over 14.1 years, with aging, dilated left atrium, myocardial infarction, and valvular disease as independent predictors.
Why the study?
What is the long-term clinical course and rate of progression from paroxysmal to chronic atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=171)
What is the long-term clinical course and rate of progression from paroxysmal to chronic atrial fibrillation?
Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is a progressive disease that eventually develops into chronic AF in the majority of patients over long-term follow-up, especially in those with structural heart disease or left atrial enlargement.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports vigilant monitoring of paroxysmal AF patients with LA enlargement or comorbidities; extends natural history data but leaves intervention effects open.
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is believed to occur first as paroxysmal, then be gradually perpetuated, and finally become chronic as the end result. However, this presumed clinical course has not been well confirmed. METHODS AND RESULTS: The clinical course of recurrent paroxysmal AF (PAF) from its onset was examined in 171 patients (mean follow-up period: 14.1+/-8.1 years). This study population consisted of patients with no structural heart disease (n=88), ischemic heart disease (n=28), dilated or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=17), valvular heart disease (n=35) or other cardiac diseases. The mean age at the onset of AF was 58.3 +/-11.8 years old. During the mean follow-up period of 14.1 years, PAF eventually developed into its chronic form in 132 patients under conventional antiarrhythmic therapy (77.2%, 5.5% of patients per year). The independent factors for early development into chronic AF were aging (hazard ratio (HR) 1.27 per 10 years, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.47)), dilated left atrium (HR 1.39 per 10 mm, 95% CI 1.11-1.69), myocardial infarction (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.13-4.81), and valvular diseases (HR 2.29, 95% CI 1.22-4.30). CONCLUSIONS: The present long-term observations definitely and quantitatively revealed the progressive nature of PAF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kato et al. (2004) conducted a cohort in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (n=171). Conventional antiarrhythmic therapy was evaluated on Development into chronic atrial fibrillation. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation progressed to chronic AF in 77.2% of patients over 14.1 years, with aging, dilated left atrium, myocardial infarction, and valvular disease as independent predictors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: