PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 1, 1990Journal of Business and Economic Statistics585 citations

Permanent Income, Current Income, and Consumption

View Full Paper
JCJohn Y. CampbellNMN. Gregory Mankiw

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This article reexamines the consistency of the permanent-income hypothesis with aggregate postwar U.S. data. The permanent-income hypothesis is nested within a more general model in which a fraction of income accrues to individuals who consume their current income rather than their permanent income. This fraction is estimated to be about 50%, indicating a substantial departure from the permanent-income hypothesis. Our results cannot be easily explained by time aggregation or small-sample bias, by changes in the real interest rate, or by nonseparabilities in the utility function of consumers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Campbell et al. (1990) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a124fa519b8e19607348010https://doi.org/10.2307/1391964
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Permanent Income, Current Income, and Consumption1990 · 395 citations
  2. 2Why is Consumption So Smooth?1989 · 597 citations
  3. 3The Changing Cyclical Variability of Economic Activity in the United States1984 · 49 citations
  4. 4Econometric Modelling of the Aggregate Time-Series Relationship Between Consumers' Expenditure and Income in the United Kingdom1978 · 1,648 citations
  5. 5Macroeconomics and Finance: The Role of the Stock Market1984 · 88 citations