Why the study?
Some patients following ACS face particularly increased risk for recurrent cardiovascular events, prompting an evaluation of temporal trends in their management and outcomes across risk strata.
Does contemporary management improve short-term and 1-year outcomes in particularly high-risk ACS patients compared to historical management?
Cohort (n=5,359)
Yes
Does contemporary management improve short-term and 1-year outcomes in particularly high-risk ACS patients compared to historical management?
While short-term outcomes for high-risk ACS patients have improved over the past two decades, 1-year mortality remains unchanged and very high for the extremely high-risk subgroup.
OBJECTIVE: Some patients following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are at particularly increased risk for recurrent cardiovascular events. We aimed to examine temporal trends in the management and outcomes across the spectrum of these particularly high-risk patients. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective study based on the ACS Israeli survey (ACSIS) registry, a multicentre prospective national registry, taking place biennially in 25 cardiology departments in Israel. Temporal trends were examined in the early (2002-2008) and late (2010-2018) time periods. PARTICIPANTS: p<3 were excluded. From the initial 15 196 patients enrolled, 5359 patients were eventually included.Clinical outcome measures included 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and 1-year mortality. RESULTS: Among 5359 patients (50% high risk, 30% very high risk and 20% extremely high risk), those with a higher risk were older, had more comorbidities, presented more with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction, and were treated less often with guideline-recommended pharmacotherapy and percutaneous coronary intervention. Over time, treatment has improved in all risk strata, and the rate of 30-day MACE has significantly decreased in all risk groups (from 21% to 10%, from 22% to 15%, and from 26% to 16%, in high, very high and extremely high-risk groups, respectively, p<0.001 for each). However, 1-year mortality decreased only among high and very high-risk patients, and not among extremely high-risk patients in whom 1-year mortality rates remained very high (28.7% vs 28.9%, p=1). CONCLUSION: Within a particularly high-risk cohort of patients with ACS, treatment has significantly progressed over almost 2 decades. While short-term outcomes have improved in all risk groups, 1-year mortality has remained unchanged in extremely high-risk patients with ACS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grinberg et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Acute coronary syndrome (n=5,359). Late time period (2010-2018) vs. Early time period (2002-2008) was evaluated on 30-day major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and 1-year mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: