Key result
Among 847 NCAA student-athletes, 73.8% expressed interest in APOE genotyping for traumatic brain injury recovery risk, and 50.6% were more likely to test if late-onset Alzheimer's risk was included.
Why the study?
What are the views of NCAA student-athletes regarding APOE genotyping for predicting recovery after traumatic brain injury?
Cross-Sectional (n=847)
What are the views of NCAA student-athletes regarding APOE genotyping for predicting recovery after traumatic brain injury?
NCAA student-athletes are generally open to APOE genotyping for traumatic brain injury recovery risk and are willing to share results, suggesting such testing programs may be acceptable if risks and benefits are clearly communicated.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Student-athlete interest supports exploring APOE testing acceptability in NCAA settings; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Use of apolipoprotein E genotyping to personalize the risk of a poor recovery after traumatic brain injury is complicated by the potential for genetic discrimination and the potential to reveal an increased risk for late onset Alzheimer's disease. We developed a survey to gauge interest in testing among athletes participating in National Collegiate Athletic Association programs. Eight hundred and forty seven student-athletes were surveyed to determine their interest in genetic testing, their willingness to share the results of testing with parents, coaches and physicians, their concerns about privacy and/or discrimination, and their interest in genetic counseling. Nearly three quarters of respondents expressed some level of interest in testing, with the largest number describing themselves as 'possibly interested' (54.9 %, n = 463) and a smaller number describing themselves as 'very interested' (18.9 %, n = 159). Most student-athletes said that receiving secondary information about their risk for late-onset Alzheimer's disease made them more likely to test (50.6 %, n = 426) rather than less likely to test (12.4 %, n = 104). Student-athletes were open to apolipoprotein E genotyping and willing to share test results with their parents, coaches and physicians. They did not anticipate that test results would impact their behavior or ability to play. Testing programs may be welcome but should provide clear information as to risks and benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hercher et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Traumatic brain injury (n=847). APOE genotyping survey was evaluated on Interest in genetic testing. Among 847 NCAA student-athletes, 73.8% expressed interest in APOE genotyping for traumatic brain injury recovery risk, and 50.6% were more likely to test if late-onset Alzheimer's risk was included.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: