Methodological evaluation demonstrates advantages of probabilistic reasoning in lymph-node pathology diagnosis, indicating the superiority of decision-theoretic expert systems.
Pathfinder is an expert system that assists surgical pathologists with the diagnosis of lymph-node diseases. The program is one of a growing number of normative expert systems that use probability and decision theory to acquire, represent, manipulate, and explain uncertain medical knowledge. In this article, we describe Pathfinder and our research in uncertain-reasoning paradigms that was stimulated by the development of the program. We discuss limitations with early decision-theoretic methods for reasoning under uncertainty and our initial attempts to use non-decision-theoretic methods. Then, we describe experimental and theoretical results that directed us to return to reasoning methods based in probability and decision theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heckerman et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: