Key result
External stenting of SVGs improves 2-year Fitzgibbon patency odds by ~102% versus nonstented grafts.
Why the study?
Little data exist regarding the potential of external stents to mitigate long-term disease progression in saphenous vein grafts.
Does external stenting improve angiographic patency and reduce intimal hyperplasia in saphenous vein grafts 2 years after coronary artery bypass grafting?
RCT (n=184)
Yes
Does external stenting improve angiographic patency and reduce intimal hyperplasia in saphenous vein grafts 2 years after coronary artery bypass grafting?
External stenting of saphenous vein grafts during CABG improves angiographic patency scales and reduces intimal hyperplasia at 2 years compared to nonstented grafts.
External stenting may optimize saphenous vein graft durability after CABG; extends RCT evidence on patency scale and intimal hyperplasia.
OBJECTIVES: Little data exist regarding the potential of external stents to mitigate long-term disease progression in saphenous vein grafts. We investigated the effect of external stents on the progression of saphenous vein graft disease. METHODS: A total of 184 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting, using an internal thoracic artery graft and at least 2 additional saphenous vein grafts, were enrolled in 14 European centers. One saphenous vein graft was randomized to an external stent, and 1 nonstented saphenous vein graft served as the control. The primary end point was the saphenous vein graft Fitzgibbon patency scale assessed by angiography, and the secondary end point was saphenous vein graft intimal hyperplasia assessed by intravascular ultrasound in a prespecified subgroup at 2 years. RESULTS: Angiography was completed in 128 patients and intravascular ultrasound in the entire prespecified cohort (n = 51) at 2 years. Overall patency rates were similar between stented and nonstented saphenous vein grafts (78.3% vs 82.2%, P = .43). However, the Fitzgibbon patency scale was significantly improved in stented versus nonstented saphenous vein grafts, with Fitzgibbon patency scale I, II, and III rates of 66.7% versus 54.9%, 27.8% versus 34.3%, and 5.5% versus 10.8%, respectively (odds ratio, 2.02; P = .03). Fitzgibbon patency scale was inversely related to saphenous vein graft minimal lumen diameter, with Fitzgibbon patency scale I, II, and III saphenous vein grafts having an average minimal lumen diameter of 2.62 mm, 1.98 mm, and 1.32 mm, respectively (P < .05). Externally stented saphenous vein grafts also showed significant reductions in mean intimal hyperplasia area (22.5%; P < .001) and thickness (23.5%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Two years after coronary artery bypass grafting, external stenting improves Fitzgibbon patency scales of saphenous vein grafts and significantly reduces intimal hyperplasia area and thickness. Whether this will eventually lead to improved long-term patency is still unknown.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taggart et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Saphenous vein graft disease (n=184). External stent vs. Nonstented saphenous vein graft was evaluated on Saphenous vein graft Fitzgibbon patency scale assessed by angiography (OR 2.02, p=.03). External stenting of saphenous vein grafts significantly improved the Fitzgibbon patency scale compared to nonstented grafts at 2 years (OR 2.02; P=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: