Key result
AF is linked to ~87% greater odds of sharing wearable data with providers versus at-risk patients.
Why the study?
Little is known regarding virtual patient-provider interactions or wearable device data-sharing behaviors among patients with or at risk of AF.
Does having established atrial fibrillation increase the likelihood of sharing wearable device data with providers compared to being at risk of atrial fibrillation?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,222)
No
Does having established atrial fibrillation increase the likelihood of sharing wearable device data with providers compared to being at risk of atrial fibrillation?
Patients with established atrial fibrillation are significantly more likely to share wearable device-derived heart rate and rhythm data with their providers compared to at-risk patients, though overall sharing of other health metrics remains low.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AF patients share wearable data more with providers; cross-sectional link leaves open engagement strategies and outcome impact.
Background: Telemedicine and commercial wearable devices capable of detecting atrial fibrillation (AF) have revolutionized arrhythmia care during coronavirus disease 2019. However, not much is known about virtual patient-provider interactions or device sharing behaviors. Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize how participants with or at risk of AF are engaging with their providers in the context of telemedicine and using commercially wearable devices to manage their health. Results: The survey was distributed to 23,530 patients, and there were 1222 (5.19%) participant responses. Among the participants, 327 (26.8%) had AF and 895 (73.2%) were at risk of AF. Neither device ownership nor device type use differed by AF status. After adjusting for covariates that may influence surveyed participant communication patterns, we found that participants with AF were more likely to share their wearable device-derived data with providers (adjusted odds ratio 1.87; 95% confidence interval 1.02-3.41). Rates of sharing physical activity or sleep data were low for both groups and did not differ by AF status. Conclusion: Compared with participants at risk of developing AF, those with AF were more likely to share heart rate and rhythm data from their commercial wearable devices with providers. However, both groups had similar rates of sharing physical activity and sleep data, telemedicine engagement, and technology use and ownership.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nuvvula et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial fibrillation or at risk of atrial fibrillation (n=1,222). Atrial fibrillation diagnosis vs. At risk of atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Sharing wearable device-derived data with providers (adjusted OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.02-3.41, p=<0.001). Participants with atrial fibrillation were more likely to share their commercial wearable device-derived data with providers compared to those at risk of atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: