Key result
Inactivated EV-A71 vaccine linked to ~91% effectiveness against hand, foot, and mouth disease in children.
Why the study?
Despite the licensure of the inactivated monovalent EV-A71 vaccine in China in 2016, no study had evaluated its long-term effectiveness on a large scale.
Does the inactivated monovalent EV-A71 vaccine prevent hand, foot, and mouth disease caused by EV-A71 in children aged 6 months to 13 years in Tianjin, China?
Case-Control (n=7,221)
Does the inactivated monovalent EV-A71 vaccine prevent hand, foot, and mouth disease caused by EV-A71 in children aged 6 months to 13 years in Tianjin, China?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This large-scale, 8-year test-negative case-control study demonstrates high real-world effectiveness (91.01%) of the inactivated monovalent EV-A71 vaccine against EV-A71-related hand, foot, and mouth disease in children, while highlighting potential viral type replacement by other enteroviruses over time.
Hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) caused by enterovirus A71 (EV-A71) is a common acute viral disease that mainly affects children under 5 years and often occurs in outbreaks or clusters in China. Given the high disease burden of HFMD and the absence of an effective drug for treating HFMD, the first inactivated monovalent EV-A71 vaccine was licensed in China in 2016. However, no study has assessed the long-term effectiveness of the EV-A71 vaccine on a large scale. A test-negative design case-control study was conducted to estimate the long-term vaccine effectiveness in Tianjin from 2016 to 2023. HFMD patients with a positive EV-A71 were assigned to the case group, and those with a negative EV-A71 were assigned to the control group. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the effectiveness of the vaccine. A total of 7,221 HFMD patients aged 6 months to 13 years old were included between 2016 and 2023. There were 510 (7.1%) children who tested positive for EV-A71, while 5,160 (71.5%) tested positive for other EVs, and 1551 (21.5%) tested negative for all EVs. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated to be 91.01% (95% CI: 84.03-95.53) for the study population. As for children aged 6-35 months, the vaccine effectiveness was 83.45% (95% CI: 68.28-92.58); while that was 96.97% (95% CI: 90.56-99.50) for children aged more than 35 months. The inactivated monovalent EV-A71 vaccine was found to be effective in preventing the HFMD caused by EV-A71 infection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2025) conducted a case-control in Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) caused by enterovirus A71 (n=7,221). Inactivated monovalent EV-A71 vaccine vs. Unvaccinated or vaccinated within 14 days before illness onset was evaluated on Vaccine effectiveness against EV-A71 infection (VE 91.01%, 95% CI 84.03-95.53). The inactivated monovalent EV-A71 vaccine demonstrated 91.01% effectiveness in preventing hand, foot, and mouth disease caused by EV-A71 infection in children.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: