Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Este articulo senala algunos desafios para los estudios de infancia en America Latina y la utilidad de los estudios feministas sobre el Estado. El argumento central propone que relaciones intergeneracionales y categorias etarias constituyen ejes de construccion y legitimacion de la desigualdad social. Asi, las politicas para la infancia no solo son escenarios centrales a la construccion de la categoria “infancia”, sino tambien un espacio donde las dimensiones culturales de las politicas desempenan un papel en los mentados procesos de legitimacion y produccion de desigualdad infantil. Por ello, los aportes de las teoricas feministas del bienestar permiten una mejor comprension de estos procesos. Social policy and citizenship. Dialogues between feminist theory and childhood studies ABSTRACT This article indicates some of the challenges for childhood studies in Latin America and the usefulness of feminist studies on the state. The central argument posits that inter-generational relations and age categories constitute axes for the construction and legitimization of social inequality. Thus, childhood policies are not only central scenarios for the construction of the category of “childhood” but also a sphere where the cultural dimensions of policies play a role in the processes of the legitimization and production of childhood inequality. The contributions of feminist welfare theorists therefore provide a better understanding of these processes
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valeria Llobet Llobet (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: