Key result
Multi-image UNet achieves a superior ~0.92 Dice similarity coefficient for SSFP images versus single-image UNet.
Why the study?
The analysis and interpretation of CMR images are time-consuming, and automated segmentation could reduce the time required for image analysis.
Does a multi-image type UNet improve segmentation accuracy of CMR images compared to a single-image type UNet in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Does a multi-image type UNet improve segmentation accuracy of CMR images compared to a single-image type UNet in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.92% vs 0.87%
p-value: p=<0.001
Joint segmentation of multiple CMR image types using a multi-image UNet significantly increases segmentation accuracy for the left ventricle compared to single-image models.
May improve automated LV segmentation in research; leaves open clinical adoption or generalizability in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
The analysis and interpretation of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images are often time-consuming. The automated segmentation of cardiac structures can reduce the time required for image analysis. Spatial similarities between different CMR image types were leveraged to jointly segment multiple sequences using a segmentation model termed a multi-image type UNet (MI-UNet). This model was developed from 72 exams (46% female, mean age 63 ± 11 years) performed on patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The MI-UNet for steady-state free precession (SSFP) images achieved a superior Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.92 ± 0.06 compared to 0.87 ± 0.08 for a single-image type UNet (p < 0.001). The MI-UNet for late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images also had a superior DSC of 0.86 ± 0.11 compared to 0.78 ± 0.11 for a single-image type UNet (p = 0.001). The difference across image types was most evident for the left ventricular myocardium in SSFP images and for both the left ventricular cavity and the left ventricular myocardium in LGE images. For the right ventricle, there were no differences in DCS when comparing the MI-UNet with single-image type UNets. The joint segmentation of multiple image types increases segmentation accuracy for CMR images of the left ventricle compared to single-image models. In clinical practice, the MI-UNet model may expedite the analysis and interpretation of CMR images of multiple types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2022) studied Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=72). Multi-image type UNet (MI-UNet) vs. Single-image type UNet was evaluated on Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for steady-state free precession (SSFP) images (p=<0.001). A multi-image type UNet (MI-UNet) achieved a superior Dice similarity coefficient for SSFP images compared to a single-image type UNet (0.92 vs 0.87; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: