Fearnside and Laurance ([1][1]) assert that “the evidence favors higher estimates” for tropical deforestation and carbon emissions than those of our study ([2][2]). That assertion is based on deforestation and forest biomass data for the Brazilian Amazon, which they compare with our
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eva et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: