Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Jacob et al. reported the first series of a combination of laparoscopic colonic & rectal resections in 1991 (1). It took just over a decade of debate and several trials to prove that laparoscopic colonic surgery (LCS) unequivocally results in better short-term outcomes when compared to open colonic surgery (OCS) (2). Several randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (3-5) have demonstrated that LCS offers reduced intra-operative blood loss, length of incision, post-operative analgesia requirements as well as shorter hospital stay. In malignant resections, LCS also offers comparable clearance margins and lymph node harvest. Therefore, LCS is now a well-accepted alternative to open surgery (2). However, the debate involving the role of laparoscopic approach in rectal cancer resection continues and is far from over (6).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emad H. Aly (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: