Key result
Neural network analysis of peripheral pulse waves achieves ~91% accuracy in detecting type 2 diabetes.
Why the study?
Diabetes mellitus is generally diagnosed via invasive blood tests such as oral glucose tolerance testing, prompting the development of a fast, simple, and inexpensive detection method using noninvasive peripheral pulse waves.
Does a multi-task fusion CNN using peripheral pulse waves accurately classify type 2 diabetes compared to single-task CNN?
Cross-Sectional (n=212)
Does a multi-task fusion CNN using peripheral pulse waves accurately classify type 2 diabetes compared to single-task CNN?
A multi-task fusion CNN analyzing peripheral pulse waves can non-invasively classify type 2 diabetes with high accuracy.
May enable non-invasive T2D screening via pulse waves; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Diabetes mellitus, a chronic disease associated with elevated accumulation of glucose in the blood, is generally diagnosed through an invasive blood test such as oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). An effective method is proposed to test type 2 diabetes using peripheral pulse waves, which can be measured fast, simply and inexpensively by a force sensor on the wrist over the radial artery. A self-designed pulse waves collection platform includes a wristband, force sensor, cuff, air tubes, and processing module. A dataset was acquired clinically for more than one year by practitioners. A group of 127 healthy candidates and 85 patients with type 2 diabetes, all between the ages of 45 and 70, underwent assessments in both OGTT and pulse data collection at wrist arteries. After preprocessing, pulse series were encoded as images using the Gramian angular field (GAF), Markov transition field (MTF), and recurrence plots (RPs). A four-layer multi-task fusion convolutional neural network (CNN) was developed for feature recognition, the network was well-trained within 30 minutes based on our server. Compared to single-task CNN, multi-task fusion CNN was proved better in classification accuracy for nine of twelve settings with empirically selected parameters. The results show that the best accuracy reached 90.6% using an RP with threshold ϵ of 6000, which is competitive to that using state-of-the-art algorithms in diabetes classification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ouyang et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes (n=212). Peripheral pulse waves classification using multi-task fusion CNN vs. Single-task CNN was evaluated on Classification accuracy. A multi-task fusion convolutional neural network analyzing peripheral pulse waves encoded as recurrence plots achieved a classification accuracy of 90.6% for detecting type 2 diabetes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: