Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the late 1960s self‐report surveys of criminal victimization were controversial and new. Now, they are common, a mainstay of statistical systems and a familiar research tool. More complex questions have arisen concerning the validity and reliability of victim survey data, including whether they can be used in cross‐national comparisons of crime and criminal justice issues. Victim survey data are sufficiently valid and reliable for use in cross‐national comparisons. Victim surveys can tell us a great deal about crime cross‐nationally that police administrative data cannot. While surveys in principle should be more comparable across nations than police administrative data, in practice this comparability cannot be assumed. Self‐consciously comparative surveys, such as the International Crime Victimization Survey (ICVS) produce more comparable data across nations than nation‐specific surveys do. Nation‐specific surveys produce higher‐quality data on their specific nation than the ICVS does. Steps should be taken to enhance the quality of ICVS data and the cross‐national comparability of nation‐specific surveys.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James P. Lynch (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: