Key result
New RCT protocol evaluates ML risk prediction and diagnostic testing to identify undiagnosed AF.
Why the study?
Current screening approaches for AF lack cost-effectiveness or diagnostic sensitivity, prompting interest in evaluating whether a machine learning risk prediction algorithm combined with diagnostic testing effectively identifies AF in primary care.
Does a machine learning risk prediction algorithm combined with diagnostic testing improve the identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults aged ≥30 years?
RCT
Randomized
Yes
Does a machine learning risk prediction algorithm combined with diagnostic testing improve the identification of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation in adults aged ≥30 years?
This study protocol outlines a randomized controlled trial to evaluate whether a machine learning risk prediction algorithm combined with targeted ECG monitoring can improve the detection of undiagnosed atrial fibrillation in primary care.
This RCT protocol will test ML-guided AF screening; leaves open whether it improves detection until results emerge.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of stroke, enhanced stroke severity, and other comorbidities. However, AF is often asymptomatic, and frequently remains undiagnosed until complications occur. Current screening approaches for AF lack either cost-effectiveness or diagnostic sensitivity; thus, there is interest in tools that could be used for population screening. An AF risk prediction algorithm, developed using machine learning from a UK dataset of 2,994,837 patients, was found to be more effective than existing models at identifying patients at risk of AF. Therefore, the aim of the trial is to assess the effectiveness of this risk prediction algorithm combined with diagnostic testing for the identification of AF in a real-world primary care setting. Eligible participants (aged ≥30 years and without an existing AF diagnosis) registered at participating UK general practices will be randomised into intervention and control arms. Intervention arm participants identified at highest risk of developing AF (algorithm risk score ≥ 7.4%) will be invited for a 12‑lead electrocardiogram (ECG) followed by two-weeks of home-based ECG monitoring with a KardiaMobile device. Control arm participants will be used for comparison and will be managed routinely. The primary outcome is the number of AF diagnoses in the intervention arm compared with the control arm during the research window. If the trial is successful, there is potential for the risk prediction algorithm to be implemented throughout primary care for narrowing the population considered at highest risk for AF who could benefit from more intensive screening for AF. Trial Registration: NCT04045639.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hill et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation. Machine learning risk prediction algorithm combined with diagnostic testing (12-lead ECG and 2-week KardiaMobile monitoring) vs. Routine management was evaluated on Number of AF diagnoses during the research window. This is a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating a machine learning risk prediction algorithm combined with diagnostic testing to identify undiagnosed atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: