Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: We assessed the face and content validity of a new portable laparoscopic trainer, the EZ Trainer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The portable, affordable EZ trainer system was conceived, designed and commissioned by academic surgeons from the departments of urology at our 2 institutions with the express purpose of advancing laparoscopic surgical training. A total of 42 participants, including general surgeons, obstetricians/gynecologists, urologists and industry representatives, assessed the face and the content validity of the trainer using a standard questionnaire. Participants were stratified into high (greater than 30 laparoscopic cases per year) and low (less than 30 cases per year) volume laparoscopists. RESULTS: Of the participants 96% rated the trainer as a realistic laparoscopic training format. Of high volume laparoscopists 81.5% rated the trainer as comfortable to use, 92.6% found that the trainer was a realistic practice format, 70.4% would purchase the trainer for personal use and 85.2% would recommend that the trainer be made available to surgical residents in their discipline. Of low volume laparoscopists 87% rated the trainer as comfortable to use, 93.3% found that the trainer was a realistic practice format, 73.3% would purchase the trainer for personal use and 80% would recommend that the trainer be made available to diverse surgical residents. CONCLUSIONS: The EZ trainer system has face and content validity as a portable laparoscopic trainer across a broad range of surgical disciplines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hruby et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: