This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Grandiose narcissism is increasingly conceptualized as encompassing two dimensions: admiration and rivalry. Clarifying how these aspects are shaped requires attention to the intrapsychic regulators and interpersonal motivational systems that organize narcissistic functioning. A total of 478 participants completed an online survey including the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire (NARQ), the Defense Mechanisms Rating Scale-Self Report-30 (DMRS-SR-30), and the Social Mentalities Scale (SMS). Rivalry showed a stronger negative association with overall defensive functioning (ODF; r=-0.34, p<.001) compared to admiration (r=-0.09, p<.05). At the interpersonal level, rivalry was positively associated with insecurity (r=0.25, p<.001) and agonism (r=0.48, p<.001), and negatively with prosociality (r=-0.30, p<.001), belongingness (r=-0.28, p<.001), and playfulness (r=-0.23, p<.001). Admiration, in contrast, was positively associated with agonism (r=0.42, p<.001) and sexuality (r=0.23, p<.001). The mediation analysis (moderated by gender) indicated that defensive functioning impacted narcissistic expression through specific interpersonal motivational systems: insecurity (βmales=0.036, p=.040; βfemales=0.055, p=.009), prosociality (βmales=-0.033, p=.033; βfemales=-0.085, p=.002), and agonism (βmales=-0.163, p=<.001; βfemales=-0.132, p=.001). The study expands theoretical and clinical knowledge of the underlying motivations and defense mechanisms involved in grandiose narcissism, shedding light on specific intrapsychic and relational processes underpinning narcissistic dynamics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanzilli et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: