Key result
NT-proBNP outperforms microRNAs in detecting AF in ischemic stroke patients with a 0.92 AUC.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate selected microRNAs as biomarkers of atrial fibrillation in ischemic stroke patients compared to established biochemical biomarkers.
Do microRNAs and biochemical biomarkers accurately detect atrial fibrillation in ischemic stroke patients?
Case-Control (n=117)
No
Do microRNAs and biochemical biomarkers accurately detect atrial fibrillation in ischemic stroke patients?
Conventional biochemical biomarkers like NT-proBNP, but not microRNAs, are significantly associated with atrial fibrillation in ischemic stroke patients.
NT-proBNP may aid AF detection in ischemic stroke; case-control data leaves microRNA utility and prospective validation open.
This study aimed to evaluate the ability of selected microRNAs as biomarkers of atrial fibrillation (AF) in ischemic stroke patients in comparison with other established biochemical biomarkers. A prospective case-control study of consecutive ischemic stroke patients with AF admitted to a comprehensive stroke center was conducted. The control group consisted of patients with ischemic stroke with no AF detected on prolonged (at least 3 weeks) Holter ECG monitoring. As potential biomarkers of AF, we analyzed the plasma levels of microRNAs (miR-21, miR-29b, miR-133b, miR-142-5p, miR-150, miR-499, and miR-223-3p) and 13 biochemical biomarkers at admission. The predictive accuracy of biomarkers was assessed by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. The data of 117 patients were analyzed (61 with AF, 56 with no AF, 46% men, median age 73 years, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale 6). Biochemical biomarkers (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP], high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, eGFR, and total triglycerides) were significantly associated with AF. NT-proBNP had the best diagnostic performance for AF with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.92 (95%, CI 0.86-0.98); a cutoff value of >528 ng/L had a sensitivity of 79% and a specificity of 97%. None of the other biomarkers, including microRNAs, was associated with AF. Conventional biochemical biomarkers (NT-proBNP, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, eGFR, and triglycerides), but not microRNAs (miR-21, miR-29b, miR-133b, miR-142-5p, miR-150, miR-499, and miR-223-3p) were significantly associated with AF in our ischemic stroke cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Janský et al. (2024) conducted a case-control in Ischemic stroke (n=117). Plasma levels of microRNAs and biochemical biomarkers was evaluated on Diagnostic performance for atrial fibrillation (AUC 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.98). Conventional biochemical biomarkers, particularly NT-proBNP (AUC 0.92; 95% CI 0.86-0.98), but not microRNAs, were significantly associated with atrial fibrillation in ischemic stroke patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: