This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Consider the task of estimating a random vector <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">X</tex> from noisy observations <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$Y=X+Z$</tex>, where <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Z</tex> is a standard normal vector, under the <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Lᵖ</tex> fidelity criterion. This work establishes that, for <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1≤ p≤ 2</tex>, the optimal Bayesian estimator is linear and positive definite if and only if the prior distribution on <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">X</tex> is a (non-degenerate) multivariate Gaussian. Furthermore, for <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">$p > 2$</tex>, it is demonstrated that there are infinitely many priors that can induce such an estimator.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barnes et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: