Key result
Male sex linked to ~60% higher 5-year CAC progression vs females, narrowing at higher ASCVD risk.
Why the study?
Despite growing awareness of sex differences in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, whether coronary atherosclerosis progression differs between women and men remains unclear.
Does coronary artery calcium progression differ between men and women among asymptomatic individuals?
Cohort (n=11,384)
Yes
Does coronary artery calcium progression differ between men and women among asymptomatic individuals?
Absolute Event Rate: 47.4% vs 29.7%
p-value: p=<0.001
Men have a higher rate of coronary artery calcium progression than women, particularly among those with low baseline ASCVD risk.
Hypothesis-generating for sex-specific CAC monitoring in low-ASCVD-risk adults; prospective studies needed before clinical adoption.
Even with increasing awareness of sex-related differences in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), it remains unclear whether the progression of coronary atherosclerosis differs between women and men. We sought to compare coronary artery calcium (CAC) progression between women and men. From a retrospective, multicentre registry of consecutive asymptomatic individuals who underwent CAC scoring, we identified 9,675 men and 1,709 women with follow-up CAC scoring. At baseline, men were more likely to have a CAC score >0 than were women (47.8% vs. 28.6%). The probability of CAC progression at 5 years, defined as [√CAC score (follow-up)-√CAC score (baseline)] ≥2.5, was 47.4% in men and 29.7% in women (p<0.001). When we stratified subjects according to the 10-year ASCVD risk (<5%, ≥5% and <7.5%, and ≥7.5%), a sex difference was observed in the low risk group (CAC progression at 5 years, 37.6% versus 17.9%; p<0.001). However, it became weaker as the 10-year ASCVD risk increased (64.2% versus 46.2%; p<0.001, and 74.8% versus 68.7%; p = 0.090). Multivariable analysis demonstrated that male sex was independently associated with CAC progression rate among the entire group (p<0.001). Subgroup analyses showed an independent association between male sex and CAC progression rate only in the low-risk group. The CAC progression rate is higher in men than in women. However, the difference between women and men diminishes as the 10-year ASCVD risk increases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Asymptomatic individuals undergoing coronary artery calcium scoring (n=11,384). Male sex vs. Female sex was evaluated on CAC progression at 5 years, defined as [√CAC score (follow-up)-√CAC score (baseline)] ≥2.5 (p=<0.001). Male sex was associated with a higher rate of coronary artery calcium progression at 5 years compared to female sex (47.4% vs 29.7%, p<0.001), though the difference diminished at higher ASCVD risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: