This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
MOTIVATION: Research in the biomedical domain can have a major impact through open sharing of the data produced. For this reason, it is important to be able to identify instances of data production and deposition for potential re-use. Herein, we report on the automatic identification of data deposition statements in research articles. RESULTS: We apply machine learning algorithms to sentences extracted from full-text articles in PubMed Central in order to automatically determine whether a given article contains a data deposition statement, and retrieve the specific statements. With an Support Vector Machine classifier using conditional random field determined deposition features, articles containing deposition statements are correctly identified with 81% F-measure. An error analysis shows that almost half of the articles classified as containing a deposition statement by our method but not by the gold standard do indeed contain a deposition statement. In addition, our system was used to process articles in PubMed Central, predicting that a total of 52 932 articles report data deposition, many of which are not currently included in the Secondary Source Identifier [si] field for MEDLINE citations. AVAILABILITY: All annotated datasets described in this study are freely available from the NLM/NCBI website at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/CBBresearch/Fellows/Neveol/DepositionDataSets.zip CONTACT: aurelie.neveol@nih.gov; john.wilbur@nih.gov; zhiyong.lu@nih.gov SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Névéol et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: