Key result
Home telehealth demonstrated clinical effectiveness in diabetes, mental health, high-risk pregnancy monitoring, heart failure, and cardiac disease across 130 reviewed projects.
Why the study?
Does a home telehealth intervention improve patient outcomes, economic impact, or other metrics compared to non-telehealth standard care?
Systematic Review
Does a home telehealth intervention improve patient outcomes, economic impact, or other metrics compared to non-telehealth standard care?
Home telehealth demonstrates clinical effectiveness across several conditions including heart failure and cardiac disease, though robust economic data is frequently lacking.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports adoption of home telehealth for HF and cardiac disease; extends evidence synthesis across chronic conditions.
We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify studies in home telehealth that compared a home telehealth intervention with a non-telehealth standard/usual care alternative in terms of administrative changes, patient management decisions, patient outcomes, caregiver outcomes, economic impact or social impact on patients. A search of various databases produced 6643 references. Of these 769 papers were selected for more detailed investigation. These papers, combined with hand searching of relevant telehealth journals and cross-referencing of citations in identified publications, resulted in 1 38 papers referring to 1 30 projects for review. In this preliminary analysis we used a quality appraisal approach that took into account the study design. An additional analysis of patient numbers was then used to calculate a net evidence score. A large proportion of studies (80%) were randomised controlled trials. Only 22 projects (17%) reported economic data deemed to be sufficient for appraisal. Evidence exists for the clinical effectiveness of home telehealth in diabetes, the general area of mental health, high risk pregnancy monitoring, heart failure and cardiac disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bensink et al. (2006) conducted a systematic review in Diabetes, mental health, high risk pregnancy, heart failure, and cardiac disease. Home telehealth vs. Non-telehealth standard/usual care was evaluated on Administrative changes, patient management decisions, patient outcomes, caregiver outcomes, economic impact or social impact. Home telehealth demonstrated clinical effectiveness in diabetes, mental health, high-risk pregnancy monitoring, heart failure, and cardiac disease across 130 reviewed projects.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: