Key result
Higher visit-to-visit variability of systolic BP (highest vs lowest quintile) increased the risk of incident ESRD or ≥50% decline in eGFR (HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.25-3.36; P trend=0.004).
Why the study?
Does higher visit-to-visit variability of BP increase the risk of renal outcomes in hypertensive patients?
RCT (n=21,245)
randomized
Does higher visit-to-visit variability of BP increase the risk of renal outcomes in hypertensive patients?
Effect estimate: HR 2.05 (95% CI 1.25 to 3.36)
p-value: p=0.004
Higher visit-to-visit variability of blood pressure is associated with a higher risk of adverse renal outcomes independent of mean blood pressure.
BP variability was associated with higher renal risk independent of mean BP; leaves open whether targeting variability improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Increased visit-to-visit variability of BP is associated with cardiovascular disease risk. We examined the association of visit-to-visit variability of BP with renal outcomes among 21,245 participants in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We measured mean BP and visit-to-visit variability of BP, defined as SD, across five to seven visits occurring 6-28 months after participants were randomized to chlorthalidone, amlodipine, or lisinopril. The composite outcome included incident ESRD after assessment of SD of systolic BP or ≥50% decline in eGFR between 24 months and 48 or 72 months after randomization. We repeated the analyses using average real variability and peak value of systolic BP and for visit-to-visit variability of diastolic BP. RESULTS: Over a mean follow-up of 3.5 years, 297 outcomes occurred. After multivariable adjustment, including baseline eGFR and mean systolic BP, the hazard ratios for the composite end point were 1.29 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.75 to 2.22), 1.76 (95% CI, 1.06 to 2.91), 1.46 (95% CI, 0.88 to 2.45), and 2.05 (95% CI, 1.25 to 3.36) for the second through fifth (SD of systolic BP =6.63-8.82, 8.83-11.14, 11.15-14.56, and >14.56 mmHg, respectively) versus the first (SD of systolic BP <6.63 mmHg) quintile of SD of systolic BP, respectively (P trend =0.004). The association was similar when ESRD and a 50% decline in eGFR were analyzed separately, for other measures of visit-to-visit variability of systolic BP, and for visit-to-visit variability of diastolic BP. CONCLUSIONS: Higher visit-to-visit variability of BP is associated with higher risk of renal outcomes independent of mean BP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Whittle et al. (2016) conducted an RCT in CKD outcomes (n=21,245). Visit-to-visit variability of systolic BP (highest quintile) vs. Lowest quintile of visit-to-visit variability of systolic BP was evaluated on Composite of incident ESRD or ≥50% decline in eGFR (HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.36, p=0.004). Higher visit-to-visit variability of systolic BP (highest vs lowest quintile) increased the risk of incident ESRD or ≥50% decline in eGFR (HR 2.05; 95% CI 1.25-3.36; P trend=0.004).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: