Why the study?
Does intravenous hirudin compared to heparin improve safety (reduce major hemorrhage or anaphylaxis) in patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving thrombolysis and aspirin?
Population
757 patients with acute myocardial infarction
Comparison
Intravenous hirudin as adjunctive therapy to… vs Heparin as adjunctive therapy to thrombolysis…
Design
RCT, Randomized (randomization was suspended after 757 patients)
Authors
Loading...
Hirudin increases major nonintracranial bleeding versus heparin in thrombolyzed AMI; challenges phase II safety estimates and prompted subsequent dose reductions.
Does intravenous hirudin compared to heparin improve safety (reduce major hemorrhage or anaphylaxis) in patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving thrombolysis and aspirin?
The TIMI 9A trial demonstrated that the selected doses of hirudin and heparin as adjuncts to thrombolysis in AMI caused unacceptably high rates of major hemorrhage, necessitating dose reductions and strict aPTT monitoring in subsequent trials.
Elliott M. Antman (1994) studied this question.