Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study aimed to compare pro- and anti-fluoride Japanese YouTube videos on understandability, actionability, flow, reliability, and engagement. Eighty-four videos found via a keyword search (pro = 49, anti = 18, other = 17) were analyzed. Quality was assessed using three validated tools—namely, Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V), Global Quality Score (GQS), and modified DISCERN (mDISCERN). Engagement was measured as view rate. Pro-fluoride videos scored higher on reliability (mDISCERN 2.6 ± 1.0 vs 1.3 ± 0.6) and overall quality (GQS 2.5 ± 1.4 vs 1.0 ± 0.9; both p < 0.001). No group differences emerged for understandability (58% versus 53%; p = 0.23) or actionability (60% versus 53%; p = 0.33). In the anti-fluoride group, a higher view rate positively correlated with understandability and GQS (ρ ≈ 0.53; p ≈ 0.03); no correlation was found for pro-videos. Only 27% of the videos satisfied the PEMAT-A/V understandability threshold. Reliable, expert-made pro-fluoride videos attract modest audiences, whereas anti-fluoride videos can achieve a wide reach when they are easy to follow and well-structured. However, scientific accuracy alone cannot guarantee audience reach or engagement. Oral health authorities should design algorithm-sensitive, evidence-based videos that are clear and actionable. This is the first study to integrate the PEMAT-A/V, GQS, and mDISCERN with YouTube analytics for Japanese fluoride content, thereby providing a data-driven framework for algorithm-aware oral-health messaging. • Pro-fluoride videos exhibited a higher reliability score but lower audience reach. • Understandable and well-structured anti-fluoride videos exhibited a high view rate. • Only one-quarter of all videos satisfied the PEMAT-A/V understandability threshold. • PEMAT-A/V, GQS, and mDISCERN triangulated with analytics reveal engagement drivers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: