Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Risk factors of depression in later life, particularly for sub-cases and for psychotic and neurotic types of depression, are unclear. AIMS: To identify such risk factors. METHOD: Over 5200 older people (> or = 65 years), randomly selected from Liverpool, were interviewed using the Geriatric Mental State (GMS) and the Minimum Data Set (MDS). The computer-assisted diagnosis AGECAT identified 483 cases and 575 sub-cases of depression and 2451 with no mental problems. Logistic regression was employed to examine factors relevant to caseness. RESULTS: In multiple logistical regression, odds ratios (ORs) were significantly high for being female (2.04, 95% CI 1.56-2.69), widowed (2.00, 1.18-3.39), having alcohol problems (4.37, 1.40-2.94), physical disablement (2.03, 1.40-2.94), physical illness (1.98, 1.25-3.15), taking medications to calm down (10.04, 6.41-15.71), and dissatisfaction with life (moderate 4.54, 3.50-5.90; more severe 29.00, 16.00-52.59). Good social networks reduced the ORs. If sub-cases were included as controls, the statistical significance was reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Age was not associated with depression in later life whereas gender, physical disablement and dissatisfaction with life were. The sub-cases shared many risk factors with cases, suggesting that prevention may need to be attempted at an early stage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Copeland et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: