PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2020Revija Kopaonicke skole prirodnog prava4 citationsOpen Access

Involuntary dissolution for deadlock and oppression

VRVuk Radović

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Serbian company law recognizes the right of shareholders to seek judicial dissolution of the company. In this article, the author analyzes material conditions for ordering dissolution, with a special emphasis on deadlock and oppression. There are at least three reasons why this topic is very important for Serbia. Firstly, judicial cases involving dissolution request by shareholders are more often, and unfortunately at this point there are many open questions still not resolved in practice. Secondly, in domestic literature this right is almost exclusively associated with shareholders' minority rights, and that is only partially correct. Thirdly, legal norms dealing with this right are very imprecise and broadly formulated, and therefore can be interpreted in different ways. This article tries to clarify the essence of each reason for judicial dissolution of a company requested by shareholders, particularly by using experiences in comparative judicial practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vuk Radović (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1286151292a1e50c351f43https://doi.org/10.5937/rkspp2001101r
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper