Key result
Combined anodal tDCS and HRV biofeedback reduces stress responses more than biofeedback alone or control.
Why the study?
The effects of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex tDCS and heart-rate variability biofeedback, applied alone or concomitantly during anticipatory stress, remained unexplored.
Does the combination of anodal tDCS and heart-rate variability biofeedback reduce psychophysiological stress responses in participants facing an anticipatory stressor?
RCT (n=80)
Randomized
Does the combination of anodal tDCS and heart-rate variability biofeedback reduce psychophysiological stress responses in participants facing an anticipatory stressor?
Combining proactive transcranial direct current stimulation with heart-rate variability biofeedback provides a non-invasive approach to significantly reduce psychophysiological stress responses.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support combined tDCS plus biofeedback for anticipatory stress reduction; extends RCT evidence for this non-invasive pairing.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have identified the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) as a core region in cognitive emotional regulation. Transcranial direct current stimulations of the dlPFC (tDCS) and heart-rate variability biofeedback (BFB) are known to regulate emotional processes. However, the effect of these interventions applied either alone or concomitantly during an anticipatory stress remains unexplored. OBJECTIVE: The study investigated the effect of anodal tDCS and BFB, alone or combined, on psychophysiological stress responses and cognitive functioning. METHODS: Following a stress anticipation induction, 80 participants were randomized into four groups and subjected to a 15-min intervention: neutral video viewing (ctrl), left dlPFC anodal tDCS (tdcs), heart-rate variability biofeedback (bfb), or a combined treatment (bfb + tdcs). Participants were then immediately confronted with the stressor, which was followed by an assessment of executive functions. Psychophysiological stress responses were assessed throughout the experiment (heart rate, heart-rate variability, salivary cortisol). RESULTS: The tdcs did not modulate stress responses. Compared with both ctrl and tdcs interventions, bfb reduced physiological stress and improved executive functions after the stressor. The main finding revealed that bfb + tdcs was the most effective intervention, yielding greater reduction in psychological and physiological stress responses than bfb. CONCLUSIONS: Combining preventive tDCS with BFB is a relevant interventional approach to reduce psychophysiological stress responses, hence offering a new and non-invasive treatment of stress-related disorders. Biofeedback may be particularly useful for preparing for an important stressful event when performance is decisive.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schlatter et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Anticipatory stress (n=80). Combined anodal tDCS and heart-rate variability biofeedback vs. Neutral video viewing, tDCS alone, or biofeedback alone was evaluated on Psychophysiological stress responses (heart rate, heart-rate variability, salivary cortisol) and cognitive functioning. Combined anodal tDCS and heart-rate variability biofeedback yielded greater reductions in psychological and physiological stress responses than biofeedback alone or control.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: