PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 1, 1990Circulation185 citationsOpen Access

Catheter ablation of the atrial myocardium in human type I atrial flutter.

View Full Paper
NSNadir SaoudiGAG AtallahGKGilbert Kirkorian

Key Points

  • Determine whether targeted catheter ablation of the critical slow conduction zone in the atrial myocardium can safely eliminate drug-refractory type I atrial flutter without destroying the atrioventricular node.
  • Interventional study in 8 patients with drug-refractory type I atrial flutter mapped using endocardial electrograms during high right atrial pacing.

Structured PICO

Does catheter ablation of the atrial myocardium prevent arrhythmia recurrence in patients with drug refractory type I atrial flutter?

P
Population
8 patients with drug refractory type I atrial flutter referred for atrioventricular node-His bundle ablation
I
Intervention
Catheter ablation of the atrial myocardium (one or two cathodal DC shocks delivered locally to the critical slow conduction zone in the low septal area)
O
Outcome
Freedom from arrhythmias (atrial flutter recurrence) at follow-up

Catheter ablation of the atrial myocardium using DC shocks is a feasible and effective alternative to AV node ablation for patients with drug-refractory type I atrial flutter.

Abstract

To avoid atrioventricular node-His bundle ablation, catheter ablation of the atrial myocardium was attempted in eight patients with drug refractory type I atrial flutter. In seven of eight patients, a zone of prolongation and fragmentation of the endocardial electrogram was found in the low posterior part of the right atrium. Entrainment of the atrial flutter by high right atrial pacing was accompanied by local recording of second-degree regional block in several atrial sectors but never in the low septal area. We, therefore, hypothesized that the latter represented the critical slow conduction zone of the reentrant flutter circuit. One or two cathodal DC shocks were locally delivered without immediate or late complications. One single ablation attempt was performed in five patients, whereas three patients underwent a second attempt because of early flutter recurrence. Patients were initially discharged without (and after a second session with) antiarrhythmic drugs. After a mean follow-up of 15.5 months (range, 10-23 months), five patients are free of arrhythmias without antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Two patients did not experience atrial arrhythmias while on a drug regimen that was previously found to be ineffective, and a third patient had flutter recurrences. This study suggests that patients with type I atrial flutter referred for atrioventricular node-His bundle ablation may be successfully managed by delivering the ablative shock directly on the atrial arrhythmia substrate.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Saoudi et al. (1990) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a128ed4f7bd4f5c7da6876chttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.81.3.762
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Catheter Ablation for Atrial Flutter: Current Concepts and Results1992 · 7 citations
  2. 2Radiofrequency catheter ablation for the treatment of human type 1 atrial flutter. Identification of a critical zone in the reentrant circuit by endocardial mapping techniques.1992 · 532 citations
  3. 3Catheter Ablation for the Common Type of Atrial Flutter: Where Do We Stand?1996
  4. 4Direct Entrainment‐Guided Catheter Fulguration of Atrial Flutter in Man1988 · 2 citations
  5. 5The Role of Catheter Ablation Techniques in the Treatment of Classic (Type 1) Atrial Flutter1991 · 32 citations