Key result
Electrophysiological testing in patients with cardiac arrest on type Ia agents showed 66% had inducible arrhythmias, with 13 of 29 patients experiencing sudden death or ICD shock over 28 months.
Why the study?
Does electrophysiological testing predict the risk of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients sustaining cardiac arrest only while receiving type IA antiarrhythmic agents?
Population
29 patients with no prior history of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias who suffered a cardiac arrest…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
mean 28 +/- 27 months (range: 1 day-84 months)
Authors
Loading...
High recurrent event rates occur regardless of EP inducibility; leaves open whether testing stratifies risk in type Ia-associated arrest.
Observational (n=29)
Does electrophysiological testing predict the risk of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients sustaining cardiac arrest only while receiving type IA antiarrhythmic agents?
Patients sustaining cardiac arrest while on type IA antiarrhythmic agents remain at high risk for recurrent ventricular arrhythmias regardless of their inducibility during electrophysiological testing.
Hook et al. (1992) conducted an observational in Cardiac arrest while receiving type Ia antiarrhythmic agents (n=29). Electrophysiological testing was evaluated on Sudden death or defibrillator shock preceded by syncope or presyncope. Electrophysiological testing in patients with cardiac arrest on type Ia agents showed 66% had inducible arrhythmias, with 13 of 29 patients experiencing sudden death or ICD shock over 28 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: