Why the study?
Does replacement of mitral and aortic valves with autologous fascia lata prostheses provide adequate haemodynamic function in patients requiring valve replacement?
Does replacement of mitral and aortic valves with autologous fascia lata prostheses provide adequate haemodynamic function in patients requiring valve replacement?
Autologous fascia lata prostheses for valve replacement showed high rates of incompetence, particularly in the mitral position, though a modified loose cusp design improved competence.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fascia lata valves should not change practice given high incompetence rates; leaves open whether modified cusp designs merit prospective evaluation.
Twelve patients undergoing aortic and 28 undergoing mitral valve replacement with autologous fascia lata valves were studied before and six months after surgery. One aortic and 10 mitral valves were found to be significantly incompetent. Of the incompetent mitral valves, two appeared to have perivalvular leaks. Six of the remainder were associated with abnormal ventricular filling patterns. Valve failure was much less common when the design was modified to provide a loose cusp structure; out of 12 such valves none was incompetent. Transvalvular gradients persist with fascial valves though they are lower than with most mechanical prostheses. Ventricular function was greatly improved in successful aortic replacement but remained impaired in the case of mitral replacement. Valve failure appeared to be associated with, or accelerated by, haemodynamic stress rather than due to inevitable degenerative pathological processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Talavlikar et al. (1973) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: