Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a framework for ethical and responsible standardisation by adapting Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) principles to standard-setting. While standardisation is sometimes viewed as technical and neutral, it has profound social and political effects. We identify relevant potential shortcomings in standardisation: overlooked social impacts, short-run market capture, and loss of expertise during certification. Further, we emphasise the distinct context of standardisation: its commercial roots, and the distinct way it serves as a sphere of knowledge-creation. Taking these points together, we land on a four-part framework: Inclusivity, Anticipation, Stewardship, and Leadership. The paper reviews institutional measures to embed the framework in committee processes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nathan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: