Randomized trial develops an integrated model to enhance myocardial infarction diagnosis, suggesting better screening methods for diverse populations.
OBJECTIVE: To enhance acute myocardial infarction (AMI) prediction accuracy and interpretability by developing a dual-model parallel framework integrating electrocardiography (ECG) signals and blood biochemical markers. METHODS: A convolutional neural network (CNN) extracted ECG features, while a backpropagation (BP) network analyzed 13 biochemical markers (troponin I/T, CK-MB, NT-proBNP, glucose, and the standard chemistry panel). Models were trained and validated on the PTB-XL ECG dataset (n=21,799), the MIMIC-III biochemical database (n=4,760), and a Chinese ECG dataset ($n=503$) for regional calibration. RESULTS: The CNN-based ECG model achieved an AUC of 0.933, with P-R interval and QRS duration as significant predictors. The BP-based biochemical model achieved an AUC of 0.960. The integrated parallel framework achieved a total accuracy of 96.6%, significantly reducing missed diagnoses for non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients with inconspicuous ECG changes. CONCLUSION: This dual-model framework provides an efficient automated screening tool for AMI, bridging ECG and biochemical diagnostics and highlighting the importance of ethnic-specific calibration. SIGNIFICANCE: By recovering NSTEMI cases that ECG-only models systematically miss and by showing that a regional cohort can recalibrate a European-trained classifier, the framework extends automated AMI screening to the presentations and populations where it currently fails most often.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: