Randomized trial demonstrates a machine learning framework improves cost assessments in batch pharmaceutical manufacturing, suggesting efficiency gains.
Active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) are produced in batch multiproduct facilities, where efficient scale-up is crucial for reducing costs and improving productivity. Traditional uncertainty analyses rely on extensive simulations, making them time-consuming and resource-intensive. This study introduces a machine learning (ML)-based framework to estimate techno-economic uncertainties in batch API production, streamlining cost and profitability assessments. Using a pharmaceutical production simulation model for the synthesis of an API via the condensation of quinaldine and hydroquinone, an annual API output of 33,000 kg was estimated, with a baseline unit production cost (UPC) of USD 175/kg. ML predictions showed UPC variations between USD 140/kg and USD 240/kg, impacting the minimum product selling price (MPSP), which ranged from USD 262/kg to USD 525/kg to achieve an internal rate of return (IRR) of at least 30%. An uncertainty analysis revealed that MPSP fluctuates between USD 200/kg and USD 900/kg within a 90% confidence interval. The probability of profitability is only 5% at lower prices but rises to 90% when the MPSP approaches USD 900/kg. The proposed ML framework reduces the computational burden associated with traditional sensitivity analyses by using distinct ML models, including tree-based algorithms, instance-based methods, linear and polynomial regressors, and kernel-based models. This approach provides a fast and effective tool for estimating the UPC and MPSP distributions. With the dataset in hand, the ML-driven techno-economic assessment (TEA) can be used independently of any additional software, making it highly valuable for cost assessment in batch production across pharmaceutical, chemical, and biochemical industries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ordonez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: