Retrospective study examines vascular changes following anti-VEGF treatment in AMD patients, suggesting minimal impact.
Purpose: To investigate the possible influence of repeated anti-VEGF injections on vascular metrics measured by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study included AMD patients with a follow-up time of at least 18 months from 2019 to 2024. Swept-source OCTA was performed on all eyes. Based on whether an eye received injections or not during follow-up, all eyes were divided into two groups (non-injection group only included non-exudative AMD). Vessel density, Vessel skeleton density in the superficial, deep, and retina slab, as well as foveal avascular zone (FAZ) size, circularity and perimetry of Angio 6mm× 6mm were calculated. Change in vascular metrics between baseline and last follow-up were compared between the two groups using t -test or Mann–Whitney U -test. Correlation between change in vascular metrics and visual acuity was investigated by Spearman’s Rank Correlation test. Results: A total of 164 eyes from 107 patients were included. The average follow-up time was 34 months. No statistically significant difference in baseline vascular metrics was detected between the injection group (57 eyes) and non-injection (107 eyes) group. The injection group received 12.56 injections during follow-up. Among all the parameters, only change in FAZ size during follow-up showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups (0.03 vs. 0.02 mm 2 , P =0.043). No correlation was found between change in vascular metrics and change in visual acuity ( P > 0.05). Conclusion: In this retrospective longitudinal study of 164 eyes, repeated intravitreal anti-VEGF injections were associated with no relevant significant changes in OCTA vascular metrics over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: