Evaluates tumor immune evasion in mice fed high-fat diet and antibiotics, suggesting new cancer risks.
Clinical studies suggested that antibiotics (ABx) administration might increase esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma risk, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We previously demonstrated that the administration of a high-fat diet (HFD) and acid bile salts (ABS) to K19-Wnt1/C2mE mice might promote the metabolic-driven tumor growth at the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) cooperatively with gut dysbiosis. To clarify whether ABx-induced dysbiosis promotes the tumorigenesis, we evaluated the effects of HFD+ABS ± ABx treatment on tumor immune evasion in mice. In HFD+ABS+ABx-treated mice, SCJ tumor growth with increased tumor cell proliferation and infiltration of inflammatory cells positive for CD8, programmed cell death protein 1 and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) were observed along with apoptosis suppression. Protein expressions of interferon-gamma (IFNγ) and phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription (p-STAT) 3 were upregulated in the tumors of the HFD+ABS+ABx group, whose p-STAT1 expression was equivalent to that of the control group. The mice exhibited insulin resistance and metabolic endotoxemia, and metagenomic analysis of their ileal excrement revealed dysbiosis with a decrease in butyrate-producing bacteria and bacterial butanoate metabolism activity. Moreover, IFNγ stimulation of human-derived NUGC-4 cells increased the protein expression of PD-L1, p-STAT1 and p-STAT3, all of which decreased in response to STAT inhibitors. Transfection with small interfering RNA targeting STAT1 or STAT3 did not attenuate PD-L1 induction, which was inhibited by the combined knockdown. Therefore, oral HFD+ABS+ABx administration to K19-Wnt1/C2mE mice may promote SCJ tumors through tumor immune evasion via IFNγ–STAT1/STAT3–PD-L1 signaling, along with metabolic endotoxemia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ogasawara et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: