This article examines sericulture stations' global impact on silk production, suggesting a significant shift in knowledge exchange during the 19th century.
This article examines the rise and global influence of sericulture experimental stations from 1869 to 1900, framing them as an international 'World Wide Silk Web'. Focusing on the Padua sericulture station as a case study, the essay traces how these stations initially emerged in response to the pébrine epizootic that devastated silk production across Europe and Asia. It argues that the adoption and diffusion of Louis Pasteur's preventive method against pébrine owed less to individual scientific discovery than to the collective work of these stations. Sericulture stations became hubs of techno-entomological knowledge, by blending traditional practices with new methods, creating knowledge commodities, and disseminating technical knowledge. Operating at the intersection of national interests and international collaboration, stations exchanged expertise, materials, knowledge and innovations while supporting local silk industries. In contrast to models of knowledge movements that focus on imperial extraction, this article highlights the asymmetrical yet polycentric nature of this network, shaped by economic partnerships, scientific authority, geopolitical aims and international contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barbara Di Gennaro Splendore (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: