Evaluates silver nanoparticles' impact on chemical soil health, suggesting limited effects.
The increasing use of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) as nanoagrochemicals raises important environmental and toxicological considerations of their usage. AgNPs influence soil microbiome functioning, which regulates essential nutrient availability. However, their effects on key chemical soil health indicators remain unclear, with existing studies limited to concentrations ≥10-fold above predicted environmental levels. The aim of the work was to evaluate the effect of AgNPs at a realistic concentration of 10 μg/kg on the principal chemical soil health indicators, including acidity, redox potential, electrical conductivity, contents of NPK, and soil organic carbon (SOC). In addition, dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen (DOC and DON) and water-extractable elements (Al, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Na, P, S, and Si) were also examined. The laboratory experiment was carried out for 3 months on Retisol, Chernozem, and Solonetz. AgNPs stabilised with carboxymethylcellulose (AgNP-CMC) or polyvinylpyrrolidone (AgNP-PVP) were used. AgNP-induced changes exhibited non-monotonic patterns, peaking at 2–3 months of incubation. A statistically significant effect observed across all soils following AgNPs application included only increased water-extractable Fe. In addition, AgNPs increased nitrate content 1.1–1.4-fold in Retisol and Chernozem, while available phosphorus increased 1.4-fold in Solonetz. However, changes were transient, indicating no pronounced long-term impact on soil properties. Partial Least Square (PLS) analysis revealed that chemical soil health indicators and water-extractable elements do not reliably discriminate between control soils and soils amended with AgNPs. Although our study shows that AgNPs had neither markedly negative nor positive effects on chemical soil health indicators or water-extractable element contents, future research should prioritise field trials. Model experiments under optimised microbial activity conditions limit direct extrapolation to field scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nikolaeva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: