Demonstrates improved accuracy and reduced costs in agentic workflows, indicating efficient LLM deployment.
The automation of agentic workflow generation is increasingly important for deploying LLMs in complex tasks. However, current optimization methods often incur substantial token-based cost due to structural redundancy and token inflation, a phenomenon we term empirical additive bias exhibited by LLM-based optimizers under workflow-improvement optimization prompts. To address this, we propose AgentEvo, a cost-aware framework for agentic workflow generation that balances accuracy and token-based cost without human intervention. Specifically, we introduce (1) an adaptive multi-stage evolution strategy that decouples exploration, refinement, and crossover for redundancy pruning and operator fusion, and (2) a cost-aware parent-selection policy that preserves diverse Pareto-optimal candidates. Experimental evaluations on the MATH, GSM8K, HumanEval, and MBPP benchmarks show that AgentEvo consistently improves the accuracy–cost trade-offs over strong automated workflow optimization baselines. On MATH it attains an accuracy of 52.47% while reducing the average computational cost by 40% relative to the strongest baseline.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: