Randomized trial evaluates trueness and safety of autonomous dental implant robotics in sinus augmentation, indicating promising outcomes.
Purpose To evaluate the trueness and safety of an autonomous dental implant robotic system (ADIRS) for transcrestal maxillary sinus floor elevation (TSFE), to compare outcomes between flat and sloped sinus floor morphologies, and to summarize a morphology-specific operative workflow. Methods This single-center retrospective cohort included 11 patients (12 implants) who underwent ADIRS-assisted TSFE between June 2024 and June 2025. Planned and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography datasets were superimposed to quantify global deviations at the coronal (platform) and apical levels and angular deviation. Intraoperative endoscopic inspection and the Valsalva maneuver were used to detect Schneiderian membrane perforations. Results Mean global deviations at the coronal and apical levels were 0.58 ± 0.38 mm (range 0.17–1.63) and 0.64 ± 0.35 mm (range 0.37–1.62), respectively, and the mean angular deviation was 1.19 ± 0.50° (range 0.56–2.43). No Schneiderian membrane perforations or other intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred. Trueness metrics did not differ significantly between the flat ( n = 7) and sloped ( n = 5) groups. Conclusion ADIRS-assisted TSFE achieved submillimeter positional trueness with reliable protection of the sinus membrane in posterior maxillary implant placement, supporting its use as a standardized, minimally invasive sinus augmentation protocol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: