What question did this study set out to answer?

This research aims to determine the effectiveness of rice husk-based adsorbents for removing Direct Blue 86 dye from water.

May 24, 2026ASEAN Journal on Science and Technology for DevelopmentOpen Access

Direct Blue 86 textile dye removal from aqueous solution using rice husk-based adsorbent

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

This research aims to determine the effectiveness of rice husk-based adsorbents for removing Direct Blue 86 dye from water.
Prepared rice husk adsorbents through chemical and thermal treatments
Conducted batch adsorption tests to evaluate dye removal efficiency
Applied both Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models to analyze adsorption data
Maximum adsorption capacity was 34.48 mg/g for rice husk adsorbent and 47.62 mg/g for powdered activated carbon
Optimum pH for dye removal was 2, with 180 minutes as the ideal contact time
High correlation coefficients (R2 > 0.97) for both adsorption models support the effectiveness of rice husk as an adsorbent

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Randomized trial evaluates dye removal effectiveness in aqueous solutions using rice husk adsorbents, suggesting low-cost alternatives to activated carbon.

Cite This Study

Zua et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12961548a0ea16656729a8 https://doi.org/10.61931/2224-9028.1552

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Randomized trial evaluates dye removal effectiveness in aqueous solutions using rice husk adsorbents, suggesting low-cost alternatives to activated carbon.

Direct Blue 86 textile dye removal from aqueous solution using rice husk-based adsorbent

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Direct Blue 86 textile dye removal from aqueous solution using rice husk-based adsorbent

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider