Randomized trial analyzes heat exchange efficiency in ground heat exchangers, suggesting air temperature adjustments enhance performance.
Compared with previous analytical models that mostly neglect air–lining coupled heat transfer, the proposed model innovatively introduces this mechanism and achieves a maximum error reduction of 0.5% against experimental data. The analytical solution of the model is obtained by using the Green’s function method. The reliability and accuracy of this model are confirmed through comparisons with existing experimental data. Research indicates that adjusting the tunnel air temperature improves the ground heat exchanger’s heat exchange efficiency more significantly than modifying the thermal conductivity of the lining. In the tested range, as the flow velocity increases, its influence on the heat transfer effect gradually weakens. The simulation results indicate that under summer operating conditions, only approximately 5–8% of the heat transferred by the ground heat exchanger is dissipated to the tunnel air-side environment, while the vast majority (92–95%) is conducted to the surrounding rock.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: