Characterizes hyporheic zone dynamics in the lower Yellow River, implying advanced monitoring methods are effective.
The hyporheic zone (HZ) mediates biogeochemical exchanges between rivers and aquifers, yet its spatial and temporal dynamics in large, regulated rivers remain poorly characterized due to limitations of point-based measurements. Here, we combined three time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography (T-ERT) surveys with continuous hydrological and hydrochemical monitoring along a meandering reach of the lower Yellow River, generating a two-dimensional, profile-integrated view of HZ geometry under three hydrodynamic states: low flow (1 December 2020), natural rising stage (1 March 2021), and peak stage during the Xiaolangdi (XLD) water-and-sediment regulation (1 July 2021). Absolute tomograms identified two hydrostratigraphic units: an upper sandy-silt cap (35–170 Ω·m) and an underlying sand aquifer (12–35 Ω·m). Percent-difference tomograms, relative to the low-flow baseline, revealed lateral HZ expansion from ~15 m and vertical growth of 2.5 m at the rising stage to ~36 m and 4.5 m at peak stage, with local resistivity decreases exceeding 38%. In contrast, the deeper mixing zone varied by <10% across surveys. Temperature, rainfall infiltration, and groundwater freshening could not explain the observed patterns. These results were corroborated by three independent lines of evidence: lateral conductivity excursions and in-well temperature records at floodplain well W2, and analytical Darcy–Archie calculations, all consistent with the predicted lateral extent and mixing fraction. River stage, amplified by the XLD release, emerged as the dominant control on two-dimensional HZ geometry. This study provides direct empirical evidence of hyporheic dynamics in a large regulated river and demonstrates that T-ERT, supported by sparse hydrological data, offers a minimally invasive and effective tool for characterizing hyporheic zones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: