Comparative study assesses circular bore detection methods for robotic automation, indicating deep learning's effectiveness.
This preprint compares five computer vision methods for detecting circular bores on four heterogeneous industrial panels, in the context of robotic pick-and-place automation for high-variance low-volume assembly. Three classical approaches: Circular Hough Transform, Gabor filter banks, and gradient-based edge detection are benchmarked against two single-stage deep learning detectors, SSD and YOLOv2, both implemented with a ResNet-50 backbone via transfer learning. All methods are trained and evaluated on the same dataset of 653 images using a unified protocol (precision, recall, F1, IoU, FPS). YOLOv2 with ResNet-50 (75 epochs) achieves the best trade-off between F1 (0.972) and throughput (≈ 11.6 FPS); SSD with ResNet-101 yields the most accurate bounding boxes; among classical methods, the gradient pipeline offers the best F1-vs-speed balance. A single neural detector trained on all four panels generalises without panel-specific tuning, whereas classical pipelines require panel specific pre-processing. The work was originally conducted in 2021 as part of a Master's thesis at the University of Luxembourg and is released as a preprint in 2026.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sergio Alejandro Duarte Pacheco (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: