Key result
CBC-derived NLPR yields ~89% sensitivity for early STEMI identification, providing adjunctive value over hs-TnT.
Why the study?
Do CBC-derived inflammatory indices provide adjunctive discriminatory information compared to high-sensitivity troponin T for early identification of STEMI in patients with ACS?
Observational (n=252)
Do CBC-derived inflammatory indices provide adjunctive discriminatory information compared to high-sensitivity troponin T for early identification of STEMI in patients with ACS?
Absolute Event Rate: 88.66% vs 50.83%
CBC-derived inflammatory indices, particularly NLPR, may offer complementary diagnostic value to high-sensitivity troponin T for the early identification of STEMI at first medical contact.
Should not yet alter ACS triage; hypothesis-generating for NLPR as early STEMI adjunct pending prospective validation.
Background/Objectives: Early identification of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) at first medical contact remains challenging, as high-sensitivity troponin T may be insufficiently sensitive during the initial phase of myocardial injury. Readily available complete blood count (CBC)-derived inflammatory indices may provide complementary early diagnostic signals. This study aimed to evaluate whether baseline CBC-derived inflammatory indices differ between STEMI and NSTEMI and whether they provide adjunctive discriminatory information at presentation (0 h) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Methods: A 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG), high-sensitivity troponin T, and CBC were obtained at presentation from 252 patients with ACS (195 STEMI and 57 NSTEMI). Diagnostic performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and 2 × 2 contingency tables to determine the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios. Results: High-sensitivity troponin T demonstrated the highest specificity (84.44%) and PPV (92.93%), supporting its role as a confirmatory biomarker; however, its low sensitivity (50.83%) and NPV (29.92%) may reduce its utility during early assessment. In contrast, WBC and neutrophil counts demonstrated relatively favorable discriminatory performance at presentation (AUC > 0.72; Youden’s index > 0.40). Among composite indices, NLPR demonstrated the highest sensitivity (88.66%) and NPV (53.19%), along with the lowest negative likelihood ratio (0.25), suggesting potential adjunctive value during early assessment. NLR, SII, SIRI, and adjusted NLR showed moderate performance, with aNLR providing a balanced sensitivity (67.01%) and specificity (74.55%). Conclusions: CBC-derived inflammatory indices, particularly neutrophil-based markers such as NLPR, may provide adjunctive discriminatory information during the early assessment of patients with ACS, particularly at first medical contact when baseline hs-Troponin T sensitivity may still be limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phonphet et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute coronary syndrome (STEMI and NSTEMI) (n=252). CBC-derived inflammatory indices (e.g., NLPR) vs. High-sensitivity troponin T was evaluated on Diagnostic sensitivity for early identification of STEMI. CBC-derived inflammatory indices, particularly NLPR (sensitivity 88.66%), provide adjunctive diagnostic value for early STEMI identification compared to hs-Troponin T (sensitivity 50.83%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: