Cross-sectional study examines inflammation effects on bone and muscle in adolescents with and without HIV, suggesting key findings.
Background To investigate the effect of HIV-associated inflammation on bone and muscle outcomes in adolescents with (AWH) and without HIV (AWOH), and, among AWH, the impact of HIV viral load and ART duration. Methods AWH (on ≥2 years antiretroviral treatment (ART)) and AWOH aged 8-16 years were enrolled. Luminex® technology quantified biomarkers CRP, sCD14, TNFα, IL-6, IL-17, IL-18, IL-10, and IFNγ- chosen based on their relevance to HIV, bone and muscle. Factorial analysis of mixed data reduced measurements into components. Sex-stratified adjusted linear regression assessed associations between HIV status and biomarker components, HIV-related factors (viral load and ART duration) and components, and components and bone/muscle outcomes. Where associations were found, individual biomarkers were investigated. Outcomes included height-adjusted-total-body-less-head-bone-mineral-content-for-lean-mass (TBLH-BMCLBM) and size-adjusted-lumbar-spine-bone-mineral-apparent-density (LS-BMAD) Z-scores, TBLH-lean-mass, grip strength and lower-limb power. Results There were 270 AWH (mean age 12.6[SD 2.5], 49.6% female) and 287 AWOH (12.7[2.5], 50.4% female). Increased component 1 driven by IL-18, CRP, sCD14, TNFα was associated with HIV status. Unexpectedly, among girls with HIV, higher component 1 was associated with greater LS-BMAD Z-score (adjusted mean difference β-coefficient[95% confidence interval] 0.15[0.01, 0.29], p=0.036); this was driven by IL-18 that was positively associated with LS-BMAD (0.90[0.26; 1.55], p=0.013) and TBLH-BMCLBM (0.72[0.14; 1.30], p=0.043) Z-scores. Biomarkers were not associated with HIV viral load, ART duration nor any muscle outcomes. Conclusion Biomarkers (IL-18, CRP, sCD14, TNFα) were increased in AWH and may be linked to higher bone density in girls with HIV. IL-18 plays an important role on bone that has not been previously described and warrants further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeena et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: