Qualitative study explores barriers and enablers to implementing an imagery-based intervention in schools, indicating key insights for practitioners.
To reduce the burden of depression, it is important to ensure that adolescents have access to effective, early interventions. Limited research has explored psychological practitioners’ views during the development of such interventions, despite the potential for this to improve implementation. A brief, imagery-based intervention (IMAGINE) has been co-developed to address issues in treatment provision for symptoms of depression in adolescents. Here, we investigate psychological practitioners’ and supervisors’ views about factors that may act as barriers and enablers to implementing IMAGINE. We used a qualitative interview study with (1) qualified low-intensity practitioners with experience of working in schools, and (2) clinical supervisors to these practitioners, working in England. Reflexive thematic analysis was initially inductive followed by a deductive mapping to normalisation process theory, a theory of how interventions become implemented and embedded in practice. Twenty-four participants (14 low-intensity practitioners and 10 supervisors) were interviewed. Six themes were identified: (1) ‘We could be doing more for young people with low mood’, (2) ‘IMAGINE stands out while feeling familiar’, (3) ‘Which young people is IMAGINE for?’, (4) ‘Pushing the depth of low-intensity practice’, (5) ‘Getting everyone on board’, and (6) ‘A good fit for services, more or less’. The findings show enthusiasm for new interventions to address adolescent depression, with low-intensity practitioners eager to enhance their clinical skills. This was balanced with concerns about the demand for low mood interventions and whether some components of IMAGINE fit within low-intensity practice. These insights suggest barriers and enablers for developing psychological interventions. Key learning aims (1) To identify implementation and contextual factors that may act as barriers and enablers to implementing imagery-based depression interventions in schools. (2) To explore how an imagery-based psychological intervention for depression in adolescence is perceived from the perspective of psychological practitioners working in schools and their supervisors. (3) To inform future research in the development of imagery- and school-based interventions for adolescent depression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McIntyre et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: