Demonstrates improved modeling of axisymmetric shell responses, suggesting simpler design approaches.
A reduced analytical formulation for the linear elastic behavior of axisymmetric shells subjected to axisymmetric load distributions is presented. The mechanical response of the shell is interpreted through the interaction between two families of one–dimensional structural elements, namely meridian fibers and circumferential fibers, whose kinematic coupling emerges naturally from the compatibility relations of the classical Reissner–Mindlin shell theory. By exploiting a geometric reinterpretation of the shell kinematics in terms of auxiliary curvature radii, a simplified mechanical model is derived by neglecting the kinematic contributions associated with one of these radii, which become negligible for shells sufficiently far from the degenerative planar membrane/plate configuration. The resulting formulation leads to a reduced set of compatibility, equilibrium, and constitutive equations that preserve the essential mechanical features of the shell response while significantly simplifying the mathematical structure of the problem. Two internally constrained variants of the reduced model are introduced, corresponding, respectively, to shear–indeformable and inextensible meridian fibers. Within this framework, the governing equations reduce to ordinary differential equations that, for specific shell geometries such as spherical and conical shells, admit closed-form analytical solutions. Based on these reduced models, two approximate solution strategies are developed. The first relies directly on the reduced shear–indeformable shell formulation to describe the overall structural behavior, whereas the second combines membrane solutions with the more internally constrained shell model to capture boundary effects through a superposition procedure. The effectiveness of the proposed approaches is assessed through comparison with numerical solutions obtained from the classical Reissner–Mindlin axisymmetric shell model. The results show that the proposed formulations provide an accurate approximation of both displacements and stress resultants for a sufficiently large range of spherical and conical shell configurations under distributed loads.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pacella et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: