Scoping review highlights depression prevalence in empty-nest elderly, indicating a need for better intervention models and research clarity.
With accelerating population aging, the number of empty-nest elderly has exceeded 100 million, including around 20 million living alone. Characterized by long-term absence of children, solitary residence or living only with spouses, the empty-nest status greatly elevates depression risks, making this group a high-risk population for mental health issues among the elderly. Multiple meta-analyses indicate the pooled prevalence of depression ranges from 38% to 43%, markedly higher than that of non-empty-nest seniors with an odds ratio of approximately 2.0. Nevertheless, discrepancies exist in research design, sampling methods and assessment instruments, leading to inconsistent findings. There is also a lack of systematic review covering concept definition, measurement tools, influencing factors, intervention models and research gaps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
NiQinmin (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: